Minutes of the Faculty Senate

Main Content

Meeting convened at 1:0 p.m. by William Recktenwald, President.

ROLL CALL

Members present: Om P. Agrawal, Mark Amos (for James S. Allen), Ken B. Anderson, Gary Apgar, Kimberly Asner-Self, Connie J. Baker, Rita Cheng (ex officio), Tsuchin Chu, Lisabeth A. DiLalla, Stephen D. Ebbs, Qingfeng Ge, Stephanie Graves, Allan L. Karnes, Meera Komarraju, John T. Legier, Douglas W. Lind, Beverly Love (for Lisa B. Brooten), James A. MacLean, John W. Nicklow (ex officio), William Recktenwald, Nicole K. Roberts, Benjamin F. Rodriguez, Jose R. Ruiz, Gerald R. Spittler, Brooke H. H. Thibeault, Stacy Thompson, James A. Wall, S. Jonathan Wiesen.

Members absent: Scott Ishman (ex officio).

Members absent without proxy: Ira J. Altman, Blaine Bartholomew, Ronald A. Caffey, Sandra K. Collins, James E. Garvey, Jyotsna Kapur, Michelle Kibby-Faglier, Mary E. Lamb, Marla H. Mallette, Diane Muzio.

Visitors and guests: Brian Nelson (Undergraduate Student Government), Codell Rodriguez (Southern Illinoisan).

MINUTES

The minutes from the meeting on May 10, 2011, were approved as presented.

REPORTS

1. W. Recktenwald welcomed B. Nelson, President of the Undergraduate Student Government. He also reported: a) J. Allen has been appointed as Senate parliamentarian for the year; b) R. Caffey has submitted his resignation as a Senator from the College of Liberal Arts. An election to replace him will be held once the fall semester begins. Senators from that college should encourage their colleagues to stand for election; c) he has attended several meetings, including the graduate graduation ceremonies with S. Ishman.

2. Chancellor Cheng reported: a) there are currently 100 more students attending SIUC than there were this time last year. This is the first time in five years that there has been an increase in summer enrollment. Fall is tracking up as well, though it is too soon to give numbers. Off campus enrollment is also looking healthy, mostly a result of the distance education activities. There are still issues being addressed at the military and other off campus sites, but she hopes to see some improvements there; b) there is hope that FY12 will be much better than FY11 as a result of the work that has been done in addressing the campus's financial issues last year. The structural deficit going into FY12 is nowhere near what it was in FY11, nor are the state budget cuts; additionally, there was a tuition increase. The campus is looking at a 2-2.5% permanent cut across campus, though there will be differentiations based on enrollment growth and academic versus non-academic areas. All deans and directors have indicated they can do this without layoffs. She noted that the unpaid days saved approximately 65 full time jobs; c) on the research side, the University recently received a $7 million grant from the Buffet Foundation for agricultural research, which will make research on track to be equivalent or slightly above last year. Staffing changes will occur in ORDA and the Graduate School through retirements and other changes; she and J. Koropchak will be working closely to make sure the research infrastructure of the campus remains solid; d) marketing and branding efforts continue. There is much more emphasis in student recruitment on academic programs. A priority list is being developed on what the new image documents will look like, beginning with prospective student materials and prospective student web pages. A different look for the campus will be rolled out in the fall as it relates to research and academics impacting student learning. Connected to that is the effort on customer service. A firm called Norton Norris has been hired to conduct "train the trainers" activities on campus. Norton Norris specializes in higher education interactions with the public, mostly between staff and students. Also, procedures and practices in all of the recruitment will be examined, with emphasis on the details; e) the University has slipped behind peers in the amount of financial aid that is given to students and is looking at ways to use more of the anticipated revenue wisely. There may be less net revenue per student, but more students; so, at the end of the day, there will be a much more positive bottom line; g) throughout the year, some reorganization was done with as a result of the distance education initiative. Instructional Support Services (ISS) in the library has adopted a new course management tool, D2L (Desire2Learn) and that entire unit will be reformed into a center for teaching excellence. She sees ISS as being key to the distance education initiatives, as well as to the incorporation of various technology into the classrooms; h) a review of the Information Technology (IT) infrastructure has resulted in the launch of a search for a CIO (Chief Information Officer). A recommendation was made to move the IT function to the Provost's office, which has been done; i) compliments to the Math and English faculties for the work they are doing in the first year courses. The Math faculty will greatly expand the number of sections being offered to first year freshmen in basic math using the technology in the classroom. Parallel to that, the English composition faculty received a $40,000 grant from the Illinois Student Assistance Program, and they have launched eight pilot projects for at risk students to see if they can get those students through English 101 and 102 in one year; j) starting in the fall, the first floor of the library will be open 24-7. This is a result of input that came directly from students [Note: The library's "Extended Hours Area" will remain open all night (24 hours on Sundays-Thursdays beginning August 22. The Extended Hours Area includes the Coffee Commons, Rotunda and Computer Lab 139 on the north side of the first floor. On Friday and Saturday evenings, the Extended Hours Area will close in conjunction with the library's normal hours]; k) the campus has almost $495 million of deferred maintenance, and this very real financial threat must be addressed. Some initiatives have been taken through the FEMA money, insurance dollars, facility maintenance fees and the Physical Plant budget. There are some campus buildings that cannot handle the power that is needed, and this will be addressed using state dollars that were given through the capital renewal. Through the facilities maintenance fee, [the needs of] Faner Hall (south end) have been addressed; l) some technology was put into 25 classrooms this summer. Classroom improvements have not been done for about three years [as a result of] the budget cutting that was done in the years prior to her arrival. There are now have 50 classrooms with technology. Other improvements include the Mass Communication and Media Arts roof project; new greenhouses that will be installed over the next month; and the Automotive Technology Center at the airport, which is on time and on budget now that the state Supreme Court approved financing for that project; m) there are many improvements to student services that will be unfolding this fall, particularly for the first semester/first year students. A task force has been formed to look at graduation traditions. With students attending convocation on the way in and graduation on the way out, she wants to make sure everything possible is done in order to retain students once they are here and then retain good relations with them as alumni once they leave; n) she just met with the Strategic Planning Steering Committee, and in the fall there will be full-fledged, campus-wide conversations around the campus's strategic long range planning.

QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION

W. Recktenwald asked the Chancellor to address the hiring freeze to clarify how [it is being handled]. Chancellor Cheng responded that the campus is still under a hiring freeze, similar to what it has had throughout the year, i.e., there are multiple layers of approval before any hire is made, ending with her. There is a lot of scrutiny as to whether it is affordable, whether it is necessary and whether there are alternative ways to conducting business without that hire. Hiring has never stopped completely because the University is very departmentalized, so a vacancy in one area may not be able to be taken care of by another area. She is looking at shared services and restructuring across the campus. There are some key administrative hires needed. She mentioned the CIO, but there are also some internal searches that have been allowed. Openings in recruitment areas will not go vacant, so there are seven service centers in community colleges that will be filled. Additionally, grant funded positions will be okay to hire in the event someone who might be laid off could possibly be absorbed on the grant.

REPORTS (cont.)

3. Provost Nicklow reported: a) the IBHE has approved the Ph.D program in Criminology and Criminal Justice and the Master of Arts in Art History and Visual Culture; b) there were a number of accreditations over the last month, including the Masters in Public Health; several others received renewals (College of Business, Fire Service Management, Interior Design, School of Music). A deferral was made for the Theater Department to allow them additional time to respond to some observations identified in the self study; c) [his office is] launching some new increased improvements in recruitment and admissions. As of July 1, the 2012 recruitment cycle was officially launched, and the current cycle is being phased out. The next cycle has the new holistic admission criteria. Over the last several months, he has worked diligently with colleges to identify what their criteria would be and how they would conduct their admissions decisions. One of the initiatives is the search and fulfillment campaign. The plan is to increase the purchase of names by 20%, with the goal of having around 450,000 names in the pool. Three or four vacant recruiter positions have been filled, and they will search for a recruiter with some unique skills (bi-lingual, for example) available to parents and prospective students who visit the campus. He would like to look at all the materials, such as the view book, in Spanish as well. The view book will be coming out, hopefully within the next month or so and will be distributed in mass over the next few months; d) he expressed appreciation to the departments and colleges for stepping up in the recruitment process. He is seeing increases in very specific areas, very targeted disciplines where faculty have called or sent letters; e) the University is operating a pilot program called MAP 2+2, which allows students at community colleges to bank unused MAP grant funds. The program is supported by the Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC), and SIUC is one of only a few in the state that were approved this year. The program is not available to all programs because there has to be a guarantee that the student can finish in two years; f) the deans have submitted their 3, 5 and 7% budget reduction scenarios, and he has been working with them to plan and prioritize how to meet the 2-2.5% reduction; g) there are two searches for which he has asked the Senate for representation; one is the associate provost for academic programs (formerly associate provost for academic affairs). He has heard overwhelmingly from the deans and colleges that there is a significant gap there in accreditation, in processing Form 90s, in making and communicating catalog changes, etc. There is currently a gap in service, and the position is needed to maintain the quality and accreditation of programs. The other position is the associate provost [and dean] for University College. This position is needed to make sure there are coordinated and comprehensive services across all the units within the College (student support programs, Honors, Core Curriculum and Saluki First Year); h) there have been a series of changes, effective July 1, to the Higher Education Act. One of those is focused on satisfactory academic progress by students. In the past, students not making satisfactory academic progress had one year to raise their GPA if they were receiving aid. If their GPA did not rise in the following year, they would not receive aid, or, more typically, would work with an academic advisor and develop an academic plan. As long as they were making some progress, affirmed by the advisor or someone in Financial Aid, they could continue to receive financial aid. What has changed is that it is no longer one year, but a semester. This means there is no warning period, so this fall there were 4,000 undergraduates who received academic progress notices stating they would not receive aid unless they set up an academic plan. Most of them have, but this will be monitored closely to see if, after a year, they are making progress.

QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION

W. Recktenwald asked Provost Nickow to explain what will happen if a school or college loses a position to attrition or some other reason. Will that line then go back to central administration? Provost Nicklow responded that one initiative he is considering is returning all vacant positions to the Provost's office; then, when a position either opens up or is new, the department and dean would appeal to his office for the position. Currently, position control lies in the colleges, and the deans are making decisions on what positions to fill. The Provost's office has no flexibility to make strategic hiring decisions. In addition, his office funds the pay outs on vacation and sick leave. Provost Nicklow indicated that this initiative is still in the early stages of discussion. He has talked with the deans and several of the direct reports at this point. K. Asner-Self asked if there was any thought given to opening it up to programs [who are actually] where the rubber meets the road; for example, she has four programs, but is not a chair or dean. Provost Nicklow responded that he is open to comments and has not proposed anything at this point; however, he does see this as an opportunity. When a position comes open, it will allow him to invest in faculty and their programs--toward enrollment growth and progress. Chancellor Cheng commented that she has seen it work in an environment that has both systems, and she sees the potential for this campus. There are 280 vacant positions across the campus, though they are not all faculty; the hardest hit is the civil service. There has to be some mechanism in play that helps the institution to strategically grow. Thought should be given to strategic hiring for research and for enrollment growth, and chairs and deans having input makes sense in trying to sort that out. There are many different models, and there are provosts out there who manage this quite well in academic affairs. Non-academic units are also being examined, and the big question she asks of those vice chancellors is, "Can we do it differently? Are there ways that we can combine things?" She wants to know they have done all they can before they ask for a hire because resources are very stretched. Provost Nicklow reported that he has asked the deans for input and has left that open in terms of a comment period. He supports faculty taking the issue back to their deans, chairs and directors meetings for additional discussion and feedback.

J. Wiesen expressed concern that there might be a massive shift away from positions that are not as lucrative to those in another area of a college that are. Has that happened at other universities, where there might be fighting for positions? Chancellor Cheng responded that she deliberately stated [that this occur in line with] the University's research goals, and those are not just funded research and strategic hiring[?]; it has to be both; but, there is always that tension. K. Anderson commented that he first became aware of [the Provost's initiative] from faculty in his college (Science), and they are very concerned. This is the first he has heard of anyone articulating the goal of [position control]. He encouraged the administration to get the word out because it is leaking out, and what is leaking out is not a clear picture. K. Asner-Self asked about the timeline, believing some of the anxiety she is hearing is because no one had heard about this prior to the summer. The fear is that a decision will be made without input over the summer. She agreed that getting information out to the faculty, as well as deans and chairs, would be very helpful. It also sets up shared governance and allows faculty to make decisions that are not based on fear.

M. Komarraju asked to hear more about the strategy [for centralizing position control]. Provost Nicklow responded that it is a mix of criteria in terms of how a program is reviewed; it is enrollment, it is credit hours, it is how consistent is it with the University's mission. When a dean has to argue for a position, s/he will make the case in an entrepreneurial way (i.e., enrollment growth); that does not always mean just revenue; they can look at other criteria. Chancellor Cheng commented that the few hires made last year in the faculty ranks were based on the criteria Provost Nicklow just mentioned, but it was done ad hoc rather than strategically. She would like to put in place a formula that is more transparent than the loudest voice and a better sense of purpose for why some these lines are filled and why some are left lines open. There is not enough money for all the lines. G. Apgar commented that from his department's perspective, the last of the 12-month hires are approaching that time when they are very seriously considering retirement. When summer orientations occur on Fridays, and there is only one 12- month employee, it becomes difficult. He hoped that a long term plan will [be put in place] that might alleviate that upcoming problem.

K. Anderson expressed concern that moving position control to the Provost's office will make it more difficult for those departments with specific disciplinary needs to get that message through. There will be so many layers between the Provost and "where the rubber hits the road," that information of that kind may never get to him when the decisions are being made. Provost Nicklow believes a dean has to be able to understand and justify adequately the need for the position and be able to convey that need. At this point, he has deans asking to fill every vacant position, and he is not sure the strategy is there, e.g. is retention being considered in the filling of the position? Is research being considered? [He] is not sure at this time whether there will be a template for proposing or filling a position. There is specific criteria that would need to be addressed and focused around recruitment, retention and research. Every program is going to have unique needs, and the deans and chairs must be able to adequately convey that information to him. If it would not happen under that model, it is not happening now. S. Graves asked what will happen to [the flexibility that colleges/units normally have with open positions] if positions go back to the Provost's office and then there are cuts. Provost Nicklow responded that this year, all the vacant salary lines were swept and used, anyway. He acknowledged there will be a loss of flexibility; at the same time, he believes if there are additional reductions and those vacant lines are not there, he cannot pass the same reduction along. His office would absorb the cuts through many of those open lines internally. Chancellor Cheng noted they are unsure how many lines will be left after the 2- 2.5% giveback because almost every dean indicated they would be giving back lines to get the budget straight.

REPORTS (cont.)

4. M. Amos discussed the new Saluki Startup scheduled for August 19.

5. Reports were submitted by faculty representatives who serve on various University committees (included as Attachment A to the Agenda). W. Recktenwald asked Chancellor Cheng if she would address some of the issues in L. Brooten's Engineering search committee report when L. Brooten is in attendance at the September meeting. Chancellor Cheng responded she would do so. Additional reports were submitted for the following committees: Computing Advisory; Provost Screening Committee; and Strategic Enrollment Planning (see appendix 1 to the minutes).

6. A. Karnes reported on the June meeting of the Faculty Advisory Council (FAC) to the IBHE (see appendix 2 to the minutes). J. Legier commented on the full page newspaper ad for Midcontinent University touting 18 months, and only one day in class, to obtain a bachelor's degree. How can the University compete with that kind of advertising here in southern Illinois? A. Karnes responded that the rulings coming down by the Board are aimed at making it harder for [these institutions] to be granted approval.

EXECUTIVE COUNCIL -- None.

COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES -- K. Asner-Self, Chair

K. Asner-Self presented for approval the University Committee Assignments (included as Attachment B to the Agenda). She indicated there were a surprisingly low number of responses to the volunteer solicitation; consequently, most people received their first choice. Chancellor Cheng commented that she was unaware there was a Commencement Committee. She will look at that and perhaps invite those committee members to participate in the [commencement] task force. Also, she will be looking at possibly paring down the Honorary Degrees and Distinguished Service Award Selection Committee, as it is a rather large committee.

Nominations were approved on a voice vote.

UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION POLICY COMMITTEE -- S. Ebbs/S. Graves, Co-Chairs

1. S. Ebbs presented for approval the Resolution to Approve the 2011-2012 Internal and External Program Reviewers (included as Attachment C to the Agenda).

Resolution was approved on a voice vote.

2. S. Graves presented for approval the Resolution to Recommend Approval of the RME to Eliminate the Specializations in Digital Communications from the Departments of Cinema and Photography, Radio- Television, and Journalism in the College of Mass Communication and Media Arts (included as Attachment D to the Agenda). S. Ebbs reported that the logic behind the resolution is that digital communications has now become implicit in all those areas, so having that as a distinct specialization is superfluous.

Resolution was approved on a voice vote.

3. S. Ebbs presented for approval the Resolution to Recommend Approval of the RME for the Addition of a Minor in Visual and Screen Cultures to the Department of Cinema and Photography in the College of Mass Communication and Media Arts (included as Attachment E to the Agenda). He indicated that in this case, the department wants to create a new minor that is a better integration of history, interdisciplinary analysis and upper division courses.

Resolution was approved on a voice vote.

4. S. Graves presented for approval the Resolution to Recommend Approval of the RME for the Modification of the Specialization Environmental Management to be Renamed Environmental Sustainability in the Geography and Environmental Resources Major in the College of Liberal Arts (included as Attachment F to the Agenda). S. Ebbs indicated the change reflects the more appropriate buzz word for the discipline at this time.

Resolution was approved on a voice vote.

5. S. Ebbs presented for approval the Resolution to Recommend Approval of the RME to Modify the Cinema Specialization in the Department of Cinema and Photography in the College of Mass Communication and Media Arts (included as Attachment G to the Agenda). He indicated that in this particular case, the Department of Cinema and Photography has been progressively revamping its major to bring it on par with standard practices going on at schools.

Resolution was approved on a voice vote.

6. S. Graves presented for approval the Resolution to Recommend Approval of the RME for the Addition of the Specialization in Digital Media Arts and Animation to the Radio and Television Major in the College of Mass Communication and Media Arts (included as Attachment H to the Agenda).

Resolution was approved on a voice vote.

7. S. Ebbs presented for approval the Resolution to Recommend Approval of the RME for the Modification of the Specializations in the Chemistry Major and the Increase in the Number of Credit Hours for a Minor in Chemistry in the College of Science (included as Attachment I to the Agenda). He explained that the department wants to clean up the redundancy of having the same specializations for both the B.A. and B.S. options and also align the specializations with their specific cohorts. The other change made was to add additional tracks in clinical education at the B.A. level to make it comparable to what is required at peer institutions, as well as to provide the rigor to make the minor more competitive.

G. Apgar asked if the change in credit hours is moving from 16 to 19 or from 16 to 20. S. Ebbs believes it is changing from the current 20 to a minimum of 26. G. Apgar asked if this change in credit hours coincides with the increase in credit hours, for example, for Chem 200 and Chem 201. He is aware that the hours increased for each of those classes. S. Ebbs believes the increase from four to five is already there; this is on top of that. G. Apgar clarified that it would actually be a four to six credit hour increase. S. Ebbs agreed, indicating one more course still needs to be added to the sequence. Rather than Chem 201, it will be organic chemistry sequence. One of the courses now has a lab on top of that 300 level, the argument being that it is what other universities are providing in their minors.

K. Anderson asked how the number of hours to obtain a minor in Chemistry compares with other departments within the College of Science. S. Ebbs responded that, compared to most other minors in the college, 20 is comparable to many of the other programs, though some departments such as Computer Science and Physiology have minors with larger numbers of credit hours. He believes [this is functional], as long as there are credit hours, [and they are not absorbed into the elective hours], if there is elective room. The committee looked at the life sciences in particular because there was some discussion as to how difficult the minor ought to be. Additionally, S. Ebbs indicated that one of the issues he raised is a line in the RME that refers to potential collateral impact. Within the perspective of science, it does not preclude that [section of the minor] by increasing it, but rather simply makes [it necessary to structure electives] a bit more strategically. Beyond that, the committee did not[expect to see] a significant change in the number of hours. One course may make a big difference.

K. Anderson asked why these two issues were combined into a single resolution, making it impossible to separate them. S. Ebbs responded that this was all included in one RME, and the procedure is to have one resolution for each RME. He can ask to separate the two since the first change [is less controversial]. If there is feedback from certain other programs, he indicated that the UEPC could go back to the Department of Chemistry and share those concerns. J. MacLean believes many of the points have already been discussed. He noted that the change does not put the minor out of reach; rather, it makes it something to reach for instead of getting by default because of the major and, mathematically, it is feasible for almost every major. S. Ebbs noted that this particular change would require students to decide how much they want the minor. L. DiLalla commented that it was pretty clear from the majors that the [courses] were not too difficult. Given the information from G. Apgar, she believes it may be of value to go back to the department [just to make sure there would not be an issue in obtaining the minor for any given field]. S. Ebbs then withdrew the resolution pending further discussions.

8. S. Graves reported the committee met with Provost Nicklow and Tamara Workman (Director, Transfer Student Services) to discuss the proposed change in senior institution hour requirements. This matter is outside the committee's normal RME process, and no formal Senate approval is needed; however, the committee wanted to give the Senate membership the opportunity to add their comments to the response sent to the Provost. Currently, the senior institution requirement is set at 60; the proposal suggests it be lowered to 42. Provost Nicklow indicated he had been hearing from community colleges that some of SIU's competitor institutions have lower senior institution requirements. Consequently, advisors are sending prospective students to other institutions where there are lesser requirements. In order to maintain the academic rigor of programs, there is an add-on requirement that says those 42 hours must be 300 and 400 level courses. Currently, the senior institution hour requirement can be met with any classes to reach a total of 60 hours. Since this might involve 100 or 200 level courses, this does not benefit students in terms of academic rigor. S. Graves reported that T. Workman presented an analysis of the Undergraduate Course Catalog program by program to show what programs might be affected. The majority of programs already have in their course requirement above the 42 hour requirement, so the change will affect them very little, if at all. However, there were about 10 programs that actually had less than 42 hours at the 300 and 400 level. Provost Nicklow and T. Workman suggested that their offices could work with those programs to determine how to increase the number of upper division hours in their major to meet the 42 hour requirement.

S. Ebbs believes that because the potential change has a far reach, Provost Nicklow wanted the UEPC as a subset of the faculty to provide its opinion on the implications of that change. The committee's meeting with him was primarily to get clarification on some issues and answers to their questions. Although the request was made to the UEPC to look at and comment on the proposal, the UEPC wanted the Senate as a whole to have a chance to comment on the proposal as well. What the committee proposes to do is draft a memo of response to the policy and have it circulated among the Faculty Senate at large so that individual Senators can make comments. Once it has gone around, then the entire packet can be submitted to the Provost's office, with the UEPC's opinions and thoughts and attached input from Senators. J. Wiesen asked about the timeline for the change. Provost Nicklow responded that it will likely be fall 2013. The proposed policy is way to improve marketing capability and at the same time maintain academic rigor and integrity. It was very clear that something needed to be done. The only comment he would add is that there is one program that may have some difficulty getting enough elective hours at the 300 and 400 level. Workforce Education and Development (WED) has such a large number of hours that are taken as work credit, and that is a 200 level. The solution would be to create a 300 level work experience.

K. Anderson asked whether, in the calculations that were done, if the 300I level courses were included because if all of those 300I courses go away because of the UCC realignment, then the total credit hour accrual at the 300-400 level would be affected. Also, 300-400 level credit courses often require 100 and 200 level prerequisites, so there was a question as to whether the prerequisites were taken into consideration if the student came in and needed to earn all 42 upper division requirements here; are they going to have to take extra hours of prerequisites before they can complete the 300-400 level hours? S. Ebbs responded that the assumption is two-fold; students who articulate in would have a complete core curriculum experience, which should lay the foundation for 300-400 level courses. Transfer students who fully articulate in would have an adequate foundation on which to build those 300-400 levels. Provost Nicklow noted that the change assumes an associate's degree.

FACULTY STATUS AND WELFARE COMMITTEE -- None.

GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE -- G. Spittler, Chair

G. Spittler reported the committee has a couple of items to consider: 1) voting eligibility for those who have faculty contracts and who are not associated with a tenure granting academic unit; and 2) eligibility of faculty on academic contracts who should be eligible to run for and serve on the Senate (i.e., faculty on administrative appointments).

BUDGET COMMITTEE -- J. Wall, Chair

J. Wall reported [he and G. Apgar] serve on the Chancellor's Planning and Budget Advisory Committee; one issue under discussion is [a budget planning document]. The Advisory Committee has been reviewing the University of Illinois's planning document to attempt to determine a budget based on three potential scenarios. The incremental tuition/retention revenue plan is in progress; it is essentially a plan to potentially reward colleges for new students, and in some cases retain students. There is also a formula in place based on credit hour growth, which he understands will begin to trickle into colleges starting in October. J. Wall indicated the committee was provided with the status of the goals, aspirations and recommendations of the Agility and Efficiency Task Force, which was part of the Southern at 150 document. Two open items from the task force were presented: Centralization of business offices at the college level rather than at the department or dean levels. Some colleges are moving forward with that plan; and that deans or chairs be the fiscal officer of record for all grant accounts. It was reported that there are in excess of 400 fiscal officers at the University; some feel this could be potentially problematic in a number of ways. The belief is that the PI should concentrate on the research and that the chair be responsible for the oversight. J. Wall reported that the only other item that may be an issue is retirement. Chancellor Cheng reported that the administration has been asked by the Board of Trustees to provide a list of retirees who are still employed on campus. This is the third time this issue has come up in her one year here because of the political nature of hiring an annuitant in a state job again. She has been asked to pare down the list, but there are a number of people who have retired and are continuing to work and be productive, either on grants or coming in to teach an occasional course. She believes those are very legitimate and defensible reasons for hiring a retiree, and she does not want to lose the opportunity to take advantage of the talent in the community by allowing policies to be [lax]. In the time of a hiring freeze, she wants to make sure all policies are being reviewed and that the process is tightened up.

K. Anderson asked what the motivation is for changing the fiscal officer for individual grants. Chancellor Cheng responded that it is a question of signature authority and institutional control. It is about who is keeping track of spending and making sure the grant dollars are not overspent; and, if they are, who is going to provide the state dollars for that purpose. S. Ebbs asked if other research institutions are doing this. Chancellor Cheng responded that there are.

OLD BUSINESS -- None.

NEW BUSINESS

S. Ebbs reported that there was an article in the newspaper about the Federal Department of Education law that went into effect July 1 with respect to the distance education courses and the approval process. He wondered if this is something the UEPC will be examining. He was struck by the amount of people hours and monies that may be involved. S. Ebbs explained that the law, which went into effect July 1, states that if an institution offers a distance education course and has students in Florida taking the course, the state of Florida has to approve that course. If there are students in a course in New York, then New York has to approve that course. He indicated that he has an online course with students all over. It is a massive undertaking to get those courses certified. This is the first he has heard about this issue and wondered if it is something that has not yet filtered down to the UEPC. Chancellor Cheng responded that there is a long list of Department of Education regulations that establish financial aid. The issue is being monitored by the Provost's office and across campus. SIU is way ahead of the game because of its military and off-site programs. The University is registered in many states and currently is monitoring where people are coming from through the course registration aspect. If there are states where people are registered, but the University is not authorized (very few), then SIU will get authorized. There is time to make good faith efforts, which the University will do. Another component of this is that there is also a new requirement for defining a credit, which gets at never being in a classroom and getting a degree in 18 months (or however long). W. Recktenwald asked S. Ebbs to send the link to the news article to Senators.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

1. W. Recktenwald announced that the Board of Trustees will be meeting in Carbondale on July 14. The next Senate meeting will be September 13, at which time the Senate group photo will be taken.

2. G. Spittler announced that SIU's Flying Salukis finished number one in the nation. Also, there was a team competing in the Women's Aviation Air Race Classic; however, because of budgetary issues, only one team was fielded. They finished fifth overall.

ADJOURNMENT

The meeting adjourned at 2:56 p.m.

Respectfully submitted, 
S. Jonathan Wiesen, Secretary

SJW:ba